Therapists are beginning to question how the Jimmo vs. Sebelius (HHS/CMS) lawsuit might affect their therapy practice. Therapists are thinking of those patients who make very small, and steady improvement, or patients who have chronic conditions that need therapy frequently in order to maintain independence. Or contemplating their patients residing in independent living apartment apartments whose ability to remain there (rather than an assisted living facility or skilled facility) is dependent on intermittant treatment by physical and occupational therapists?
According to the CMS Fact Sheet on the Settlement:
The settlement agreement is intended to clarify that when skilled services are required in order to provide care that is reasonable and necessary to prevent or slow further deterioration, coverage cannot be denied based on the absence of potential for improvement or restoration. As such, any actions undertaken in connection with this settlement do not represent an expansion of coverage, but rather, serve to clarify existing policy so that Medicare claims will be adjudicated consistently and appropriately.
CMS has until January of 2014, as required under the settlement to update manual instructions and provide training to the Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs), issue Medicare Learning Matters article, Medicare 1-800 number call scripts, and well as educate adjudicators and the providers. Stay tuned. Do you have patients that may benefit?
Latest posts by Nancy Beckley (see all)
- OIG 2016 Work Plan and Physical Therapists in Private Practice - November 14, 2015
- Does Medicare Cover Ionto? - September 12, 2015
- What is A Rehab Agency? - September 11, 2015